TY - JOUR
AU - B. Williams-Jones
AU - C. Olivier
AU - E. Smith
AB - Using the Canadian research and policy context as case study, this paper will first, examine the governance mechanisms currently in place to mitigate the negative implications of dual-use research and innovation; second, compare these with other relevant international governance contexts; and finally, propose some ways forward (i.e. a risk analysis approach) for developing more robust governance mechanisms.
BT - Oxford University Press (OUP)
DA - 2013-06-28
DO - 10.1093/scipol/sct038
N1 - National and international organisations have implemented governance mechanisms to address a diversity of ethical, security and policy challenges raised by advances in research and innovation. These challenges become particularly complex when research or innovations are considered ‘dual-use’, i.e. can lead to both beneficial and harmful uses, and in particular, civilian (peaceful) and military (hostile) applications. While many countries have mechanisms (i.e. export controls) to govern the transfer of dual-use technology (e.g. nuclear, cryptography), it is much less clear how dual-use research from across the range of academic disciplines can or should be governed.
N2 - Using the Canadian research and policy context as case study, this paper will first, examine the governance mechanisms currently in place to mitigate the negative implications of dual-use research and innovation; second, compare these with other relevant international governance contexts; and finally, propose some ways forward (i.e. a risk analysis approach) for developing more robust governance mechanisms.
PY - 2014
T2 - Oxford University Press (OUP)
TI - Governing ‘dual-use’ research in Canada: A policy review
UR - https://academic.oup.com/spp/article-abstract/41/1/76/1696210
SN - 0302-3427
ER -