01331nas a2200085   4500000000100000008004100001245008800042856006800130520104700198       2017                            d00aNext Steps for U.S. Cybersecurity in the Trump
Administration: Active Cyber Defense  uhttps://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2017-05/BG3188.pdf3 aThe failure of the government to provide adequate protection has led
many cybersecurity analysts, scholars, and policymakers to suggest
that there is a need for private-sector self-help. If the government is unable or unwilling to take or threaten credible offensive actions to deter cyberattacks or to punish those who engage in them, it may be incumbent upon private-sector actors to take up an active defense. In other words, the private sector may wish to take actions that go beyond protective software, firewalls, and other passive screening methods—and instead actively deceive, identify, or retaliate against hackers to raise their costs for conducting cyberattacks. Taking into consideration U.S.,foreign, and international law, the U.S. should expressly allow activedefenses that annoy adversaries while allowing only certified actors to engage in attribution-level active defenses. More aggressive active defenses that could be considered counterattacks should be taken only by law enforcement or in close collaboration with them